Estimate the fuel cost of any trip.
Given a distance, your vehicle's fuel efficiency and the price of fuel, this returns how much fuel the trip consumes and what it will cost. It is the calculation worth doing before a long drive, when deciding whether to drive or take a train, and when working out what to charge passengers who are sharing the journey.
Efficiency and distance have to be in matching units — kilometres with km/l, miles with mpg. The one trap is L/100km, which runs the other way: it is consumption, not efficiency, so you multiply rather than divide.
A 640 km drive in a car returning 16 km/l, with fuel at 105 per litre.
Vehicles are rated differently depending on where they were sold, and comparing two of them usually means converting first.
| From | To | Conversion |
|---|---|---|
| km/l | L/100km | 100 / value |
| L/100km | km/l | 100 / value |
| US mpg | km/l | x 0.4251 |
| US mpg | L/100km | 235.21 / value |
| Imperial mpg | km/l | x 0.3540 |
| Imperial mpg | L/100km | 282.48 / value |
| US mpg | Imperial mpg | x 1.2009 |
The last row catches people out regularly. An imperial gallon is about 20% larger than a US gallon, so the same car is advertised at 40 mpg in the UK and 33 mpg in the US without anything about the vehicle changing.
Official economy figures come from standardised laboratory cycles, and real-world consumption is typically 10-25% worse. Rather than trusting the brochure, measure your own: fill the tank completely, reset the trip meter, drive normally until the tank is well down, then fill completely again. Divide the distance travelled by the litres it took to refill. Two or three tanks of this gives a figure far more useful than any published number, and it is the figure to enter here.
What moves it most, roughly in order of impact:
If you are comparing driving with flying or taking the train, fuel alone understates the case. Tolls, parking and any congestion charge are direct trip costs. Beyond that, distance consumes the vehicle itself: depreciation, tyres, servicing intervals and eventual repairs all scale with kilometres driven. Many organisations reimburse mileage at a rate two to three times the pure fuel cost for exactly this reason, and that reimbursement rate is a more honest figure for the true marginal cost of a journey. For a rough all-in estimate, doubling the fuel figure is not unreasonable for a typical car.
Convert it to km/l first by dividing 100 by the figure — 7.5 L/100km is 13.33 km/l. The two units are reciprocals of each other, which is why the same conversion works in both directions.
No. An imperial gallon is 4.546 litres against the US gallon's 3.785, so imperial mpg figures are about 20% higher for an identical vehicle. Multiply US mpg by 1.2 to get the imperial equivalent.
Use your own measured figure if you have one. Official ratings come from laboratory test cycles and real-world consumption is usually 10-25% worse, so the brochure number will understate your trip cost.
Only if you enter the round-trip distance. Enter one-way distance and you get the one-way cost — double it, or enter the total distance you will actually drive.
Yes, with substituted units. Enter efficiency in km per kWh and price per kWh instead of per litre; the arithmetic is identical. Note that charging losses mean you draw a few percent more from the grid than reaches the battery, and public rapid charging costs several times what home charging does.